Central Oregon Coast Chapter of NOW to Host Death Penalty Discussion

The Central Oregon Coast Chapter of the National Organization of Women will host a discussion on the Oregon death penalty at their July 21st meeting, in Newport.
Leading the discussion, which is open to the general public, will be Aba Gayle, from Silverton, OR. and Randy Geer, of Salem, both board members of Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.
Aba Gayle speaks all over the country and internationally about her personal tragedy and her long journey to forgiveness after the murder of her 19 –year old daughter Kathryn. Aba Gayle also serves on the national board of directors of Murder Victim Families for Human Rights (MVFHR). She is a frequent speaker at rallies, universities and gatherings of peace-seeking organizations. For a brief preview of her story, follow the link https://vimeo.com/88227858
Joining Aba Gayle will be Randy Geer, recently retired from the Oregon Department of Corrections, where his last executive position was that of Director of Inmate Services. Randy is a veteran of 31 years of service to the state and has an incredible story of his own about tragic loss and forgiveness. Mr. Geer has received many commendations and accolades for his unique and effective programs within the prison walls seeking restorative justice.
This is a free event and the public is invited to participate and join in the discussion. The meeting will take place at 6 p.m. at the Central Lincoln PUD meeting room, at 2129 North Coast Highway, in Newport. For more information about Central Coast NOW, go to the website, www.centraloregoncoastnow.com
The Central Oregon Coast Chapter of the National Organization for Women (NOW) works locally to eliminate discrimination against women in all sectors of society. Members of the Central Oregon Coast NOW are automatically members of the Oregon Chapter and the National Organizations for Women.
. For more information about Oregonians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty, go to www.oadp.org.

Fact or Fiction?: Emergency Contraceptives Cause Abortions

Religious beliefs trumped science in the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling
Jul 3, 2014 |By Annie Sneed

This week’s Supreme Court ruling that the Affordable Care Act violated the craft store chain Hobby Lobby’s religious freedom by requiring it to provide employees with insurance coverage for certain contraceptives was based on a complete misunderstanding of how these forms of birth control work. The owners of Hobby Lobby believe the contraceptives—Plan B, Ella and intrauterine devices (IUD)—cause abortions, which they object to as Christians. It is scientifically accepted that pregnancy starts when a fertilized egg implants in the uterus. These contraceptives, however, act before implantation so they cannot be said to terminate pregnancy.

Yet some religious practitioners, including the owners of Hobby Lobby, hold that life begins at conception—when the sperm fertilizes the egg. They believe that these particular contraceptives interfere with the fertilized egg, which they view as destruction of life. Scientific studies indicate this isn’t the case either. Rather, these contraceptives appear to work before fertilization. For instance, Plan B affects ovulation, thereby ensuring that the egg never meets a sperm. This hormonal contraceptive operates similarly to other birth control pills. “We have a very high level of certainty that Plan B only works before ovulation,” says Kelly Cleland, a population researcher at Princeton University.

Medical experts understand less clearly how the other methods of contraception act, because all of them have multiple effects on the egg, sperm and uterus. They can impede sperm mobility, change cervical mucus and modify uterine lining as well as slow the movement of an egg or prevent its release. Although researchers allow that IUDs could potentially interfere with implantation of a fertilized egg, studies indicate that the devices mainly impede pregnancy prefertilization. “With the IUD, the primary mechanism impacts ovulation and sperm behavior,” says Jeanne Conry, past president of the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).

But again, as Cleland and Conry emphasize, preventing implantation of a fertilized egg isn’t abortion. Another form of emergency contraception—Ella—only recently became available, so researchers have yet to study its modes of action as extensively as those of other methods. But Ella “is just a variation on the theme for the IUD,” Conry explains.

It’s unclear why the known medical science behind these contraceptives did not seem to bear on the Supreme Court’s decision. In the case of Plan B, it’s evident that the contraceptive does not violate Hobby Lobby’s religious beliefs about abortion. Research also suggests that the other contraceptives don’t conflict with such religious beliefs either. This means that, at least in part, Hobby Lobby based its argument on scientific ignorance. Medical organizations such as the ACOG conveyed the science during the trial, but to no avail—at least for the justices rendering the majority opinion. “We made these points every step of the way,” Conry says, “but the Supreme Court decided on religion, not science.”