Follow on Twitter
on October 18, 2014 at 1:47 PM, updated October 18, 2014 at 1:48 PM
By Leanne Littrell DiLorenzo
Why is it important to vote yes on Measure 89?
(1) Women are not equal in the Oregon Constitution.
(2) Women are not equal in Oregon case law, as there is an exception for “biological differences.” Current case law exempts discriminatory laws that are “justified” by specific “biological differences” between men and women, and Measure 89 would remove that exemption.
(3) Women are not equal in the United States Constitution.
Measure 89 will establish state policy banning discrimination based on sex. The language of Article I, Section 20 of the Oregon Constitution, written in 1857, has not changed. Under it women could not vote, could not serve on juries, most could not own property, and women still do not have equal pay for equal work.
Measure 89 will provide momentum for women’s equality in the U.S. Constitution by engaging all those who are still working on the federal ERA to follow Oregon’s lead. After 91 years the federal Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) has still not been added to the U.S. Constitution, even though it has been introduced in Congress every single year since 1923. It passed in Congress once in the ’70s but fell three states short of the deadline for ratification.
The U.S. Constitution still does not adequately protect women. “Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex. The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn’t,” said U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in 2011.
Four former Oregon Supreme Court justices took the extraordinary step of writing an open letter in favor of Measure 89 to debunk several arguments made by detractors. Their June 2014 letter is signed by former justices Paul De Muniz, W. Michael Gillette, Richard William Riggs and George Van Hoomissen. It made clear that women do not have the strongest protection in the Oregon Constitution. They said “… no current provision in the Constitution expressly provides those protections … Instead, the protections available to women are present as a result of case law … Measure 89 would remove the biological differences exception.” This is why women would ultimately have full equality.
One opposition group says others’ rights could be affected by passage of an Oregon ERA. The justices stated: “The text of the ERA itself provides that nothing in it will diminish the rights of any group under any provision of the Oregon Constitution. …Oregon’s Office of Legislative Counsel has also issued opinions further supporting that nothing in ERA proposal will diminish the rights of any other group. At least 22 states have adopted equal rights amendments in their constitutions. Not one of the ‘concerns’ voiced by [detractors] has ever come to pass in those states.”
The Justices concluded with another reference to the detractors of the measure: “They are mistaken to oppose passage of the Oregon ERA. We believe that passage of the Oregon ERA will acknowledge the contributions and importance of more than 50% of our citizens by finally providing women express recognition in our state’s most important document, its constitution.”
The women who sought the right to vote needed to resort to the initiative just as we have. On five separate occasions, Oregonian editor Harvey Scott was against women gaining the right to vote even though his sister was Abigail Scott Duniway, the leader of the suffragist movement of the Pacific Northwest and the first woman to vote in Oregon in 1912. But the women prevailed.
Measure 89 has broad bipartisan support. In addition to the four former Oregon Supreme Court justices, supporters include former Court of Appeals Judge David Schuman, former Oregon Attorney General Dave Frohnmayer and Oregon Women Lawyers. Supporters come from a long list of organizations, elected officials, community leaders and Oregonians from all over the state, including U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden, former Congresswoman Darlene Hooley, former state Sen. Margaret Carter, YWCA, NAACP of Eugene, Oregon Business Association, League of Women Voters, Democratic Party of Oregon, Clackamas County Republican Party, AFSCME and many more.
Please join me in voting “yes” on Measure 89.
Leanne Littrell DiLorenzo is chief petitioner for Measure 89 and founder and president of VoteERA.org.
An initiative to place a state Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) into the Oregon Constitution recently qualified for the November 2014 ballot. That means voters will decide if Oregon will finally expressly provide for equality between men and women in its most important legal document, its constitution. Twenty-two states already have ERAs in their constitutions, Oregon does not. A federal ERA has been three states shy of being ratified for years, so there is also no guarantee of equality in our federal constitution.
Some of those who have endorsed an Oregon ERA are:
Governor John Kitzhaber and First Lady Cylvia Hayes
Former Governor Vic Atiyeh
U.S. Senator Ron Wyden
U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley
Congressman Earl Blumenauer
Congresswoman Suzanne Bonamici
Congressman Peter De Fazio
Congressman Kurt Schrader
Former Congresswoman Darlene Hooley
Former Secretary of State Bill Bradbury
Oregon Labor Commissioner Brad Avakian
State Senate Majority Leader Diane Rosenbaum
State Senate President Peter Courtney
State Senator Laurie Monnes Anderson
State Senator Alan Bates
State Senator Lee Beyer
State Senator Ginny Burdick
State Senator Richard Devlin
State Senator Betsy Johnson
State Senator Arnie Roblan
Former State Senator Margaret Carter
Speaker of the House of Representatives Tina Kotek
House Majority Leader Val Hoyle
State Representative Jeff Barker
State Representative Phil Barnhart
State Representative Brent Barton
State Representative Deborah Boone
State Representative Peter Buckley
State Representative Brian Clem
State Representative Joe Gallegos
State Representative David Gomberg
State Representative Mitch Greenlick
State Representative Tobias Read
National Organization for Women (NOW) – Oregon
American Assn. of University Women (AAUW) – Oregon
The Alice Paul Institute
And four (4) retired Oregon Supreme Court Justices (Former Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court Paul DeMuniz, Justice R. William Riggs, Justice W. Michael Gillette, and Justice George Van Hoomissen) have said: “We believe that passage of the Oregon ERA will acknowledge the contributions and importance of more than 50% of our citizens by finally providing women express recognition in our state’s most important document, its constitution.”
The language of the Ballot Measure is simple:
“The Constitution of the State of Oregon is amended by creating a new section 46 to be added to and made a part of Article I, such section to read:
SECTION 46. (1) Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the State of Oregon or by any political subdivision in this state on account of sex.
(2) The Legislative Assembly shall have the power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this section.
(3) Nothing in this section shall diminish a right otherwise available to persons under section 20 of this Article or any other provision of this Constitution.”